A vindication of the validity of Nonconformist ordinations, in reply to the Tentamen Novum and Tentamen Novum Continuatum published by Thomas Gipps, rector of Bury, Lancashire, in 1698–1699, in his controversy with James Owen of Shrewsbury; vol. iii.: part 2, chapters 1-7
MS. Rawl. C. 634
Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
Description
From Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts
This is an extract only. For more information, see the catalogue record in Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts.
Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts contains descriptions of the Bodleian Libraries’ archival collections, including post-1500 manuscripts. Some manuscripts with records in other catalogues are also described here as part of a description of a larger archive. Learn more.
Title
A vindication of the validity of Nonconformist ordinations, in reply to the Tentamen Novum and Tentamen Novum Continuatum published by Thomas Gipps, rector of Bury, Lancashire, in 1698–1699, in his controversy with James Owen of Shrewsbury; vol. iii.: part 2, chapters 1-7
Shelfmark
MS. Rawl. C. 634
Summary
Apparently a copy prepared for the press.
In two parts, the first containing six chapters and the second [nineteen.] About fifteen leaves are wanting at the end of chapter 5, part ii., between fols. 196–197 in vol. iii. This deficiency is supplied by MS. Rawl. D. 1353, which contains a portion of the work, apparently in the author's own hand, commencing in the middle of chap. 2, part ii., and ending at the commencement of chap. 8 [from fol. 57, vol. iii. of the present transcript, to fol. 8, vol. iv.]
Probably this treatise is the Vindication by Charles Owen of his brother James Owen's Plea for Scripture Ordination.
Date
18th century
Language
English
Physical facet
On paper, in quarto
View full record in Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts
Collection contents
Rawlinson C: History, Theology
A vindication of the validity of Nonconformist ordinations, in reply to the Tentamen Novum and Tentamen Novum Continuatum published by Thomas Gipps, rector of Bury, Lancashire, in 1698–1699, in his controversy with James Owen of Shrewsbury; vol. iii.: part 2, chapters 1-7
