Geoffrey Chaucer — 1441; England. As Henry VI became king on 1 September 1422, the Explicit (see above) fixes the date that the manuscript was written to the first eight months of 1441. Language of NE Lincolnshire, mixed with a Leicestershire component ( A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English [Aberdeen, 1986], vol. 1. 152)
MS. Selden Supra 56
Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
-
Details
-
This item is described in 2 online catalogues.?
For the main catalogue entry, see: Medieval manuscripts in Oxford libraries
Other descriptions: Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts
Description
From Medieval manuscripts in Oxford libraries
This is an extract only. For more information, see the catalogue record in Medieval manuscripts in Oxford libraries.
Medieval manuscripts in Oxford libraries contains descriptions of all known Western medieval manuscripts held in the Bodleian Libraries, and of medieval manuscripts in selected Oxford colleges. Learn more.
Title
Geoffrey Chaucer — 1441; England. As Henry VI became king on 1 September 1422, the Explicit (see above) fixes the date that the manuscript was written to the first eight months of 1441. Language of NE Lincolnshire, mixed with a Leicestershire component ( A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English [Aberdeen, 1986], vol. 1. 152)
Shelfmark
MS. Selden Supra 56
Place of origin
England. As Henry VI became king on 1 September 1422, the Explicit (see above) fixes the date that the manuscript was written to the first eight months of 1441. Language of NE Lincolnshire, mixed with a Leicestershire component ( A Linguistic Atlas of Late Mediaeval English [Aberdeen, 1986], vol. 1. 152)
Date
1441
Language
Middle English (1100-1500)
Contents
Form
codex
Support
paper, with outer bifolium of vellum for many quires. Watermarks: Couronne and six-estelles in gutters (not identified in Briquet)
Physical extent
106 fols
Decoration
Blank spaces were left for initials at the beginning of each proem but these were never added: fol. 1 (beginning); fol. 15v (Proem II); fol. 37v (Proem III); fol. 38 (Book III); fol. 60v (Proem IV); fol. 61 (Book IV); and fol. 82 (Book V)
Binding
Plain white sheepskin parchment on boards, clasp lost, contemporary English work (fifteenth century)
Alexandra Gillespie observes that very few well-known vernacular manuscripts have survived in their medieval bindings and that MS. Selden Supra 56 is one of only four of Chaucer’s works that has a pre-1500 cover. Gillespie names the other three Chaucer manuscripts as MS. Rawl. D. 3, Cambridge, St John’s, MS E. 2and London, Institution of Engineering and Technology Library, MS Thompson 1(' Bookbinding' in The Production of Books in England 1350–1500ed. by Wakelin and Gillespie [Cambridge University Press, 2011], p. 158 and p. 165)
Hannah Ryley notes that reinforcing strips were used in this manuscript to strengthen the binding by offering support to the sewing of the quires. Ryley comments that from the reader’s point of view, these reinforcing strips are 'narrow stubs poking out from between regular leaves' and that the 'stubby strips either lie flat, because they have been pasted on to adjacent leaves, or they stand up separately'. Ryley records strips at fols 6–7, 20–21, 34-35, 48–49, 62–63, 76–77, 90–91 and 103–04, with strips adhered to fols 90–91 ( Re-using Manuscripts in Late Medieval England: Repairing, Recycling, Sharing [Boydell & Brewer, 2022], p. 75). Ryley cites MS. Rawl. poet. 163as another example of reinforcing strips in a manuscript of Troilus and Criseyde
These strips are made from what Ryley terms 'recycled material' and evidence of this is that they have traces of writing on them. Although the writing on the strips is barely legible, Ryley postulates that the strips are taken from a document of some sort, most likely from the 15th century; the date assigned by Ryley would make the recycyled document roughly contemporary with the manuscript itself. Ryley hazards that the strips on fols 14-15 may contain the name ‘John’ ( Re-using Manuscripts in Late Medieval England [Boydell & Brewer, 2022], p. 76)
Acquisition
Acquired by the Bodleian in 1659
Provenance
Smudged 16th-century hand: 'Dum sum [...] vocam[...] (M. C. Seymour, The Manuscripts of Chaucer's Troilus [1992], p. 114)
'monogram in brown ink doubtfully read as 'GW' (Seymour, 'The Manuscripts of Chaucer's Troilus' , p. 114)
John Selden, 1584–1654
View full record in Medieval manuscripts in Oxford libraries
From Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts
This is an extract only. For more information, see the catalogue record in Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts.
Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts contains descriptions of the Bodleian Libraries’ archival collections, including post-1500 manuscripts. Some manuscripts with records in other catalogues are also described here as part of a description of a larger archive. Learn more.
Title
'Liber Troyly et Criseide quod Chaucer...'
Shelfmark
MS. Selden Supra 56
Summary
'Liber Troyly et Criseide quod Chaucer . Anno Domini millesimo quadringentesimo quadragesimo primo. Anno ... regis Henrici Sexti ... decimonono'. A facsimile of fol. 60v is given as plate xxiii of R. K. Root's MSS. of Chaucer's s Troilus (Chaucer Soc., 1st. ser., no. xcviii).
Date
Written in A.D. 1441
Language
English
Physical facet
On paper, binding, plain white parchment on boards, clasp lost, contemporary English work
Physical extent
106 Leaves
Custodial history
Manuscript 3459 acquired by the Bodleian Library
View full record in Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts
Collection contents
'Liber Troyly et Criseide quod Chaucer...'
See this item
-
Requesting
-
For information on how to request this item, see Medieval manuscripts in Oxford libraries.