Arguments of the judges (lord chief baron Montague, lord chief justice North, lord chief justice Pemberton, and lord chancellor Finch) on pronouncing judgment in the case of Charles Howard v. Henry duke of Norfolk and others, respecting a settlement of the lands of the barony of Greystock
MS. Rawl. C. 347
Bodleian Libraries, University of Oxford
Description
From Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts
This is an extract only. For more information, see the catalogue record in Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts.
Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts contains descriptions of the Bodleian Libraries’ archival collections, including post-1500 manuscripts. Some manuscripts with records in other catalogues are also described here as part of a description of a larger archive. Learn more.
Title
Arguments of the judges (lord chief baron Montague, lord chief justice North, lord chief justice Pemberton, and lord chancellor Finch) on pronouncing judgment in the case of Charles Howard v. Henry duke of Norfolk and others, respecting a settlement of the lands of the barony of Greystock
Shelfmark
MS. Rawl. C. 347
Summary
Some arguments of counsel are included.
At the end (reversing the volume) is the draught of a remonstrance with one Mr. Gipps for making fraudulent representations with a view to a marriage settlement, at the instigation of Thomas Roper.
Date
24 Jan–17 Jun 1682
Language
English
Physical facet
On paper, in folio
Physical extent
32 Leaves
View full record in Bodleian Archives & Manuscripts
Collection contents
Rawlinson C: History, Theology
Arguments of the judges (lord chief baron Montague, lord chief justice North, lord chief justice Pemberton, and lord chancellor Finch) on pronouncing judgment in the case of Charles Howard v. Henry duke of Norfolk and others, respecting a settlement of the lands of the barony of Greystock
